People v. Braslaw
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BANKE, J.
— Defendant Steven M. Braslaw, following a jury trial, was found guilty of raping an intoxicated person (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (a)(3)). On appeal, he contends the trial court should have given further jury instructions on a defendant’s belief in the victim’s capacity to consent and should have instructed on attempted rape. He also claims his counsel was ineffective in failing to object to alleged prosecutorial misconduct. In the published portion of this decision, we conclude there was no instructional error. In the unpublished portion, we reject the claim of ineffective…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. RundleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. MolanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. FontenotCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. Lujano, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People v. Richards, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- (HC) Oquita v. DiazDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.