People v. Lujano
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the Court
MENETREZ, J.*
*189INTRODUCTION
A jury convicted Andres Lujano of sodomy of an intoxicated person ( Pen. Code, § 286, subd. (i) ),1 and the trial court sentenced him to six years in state prison. He appeals, claiming the trial court prejudicially erred by refusing to instruct the jury that an actual and reasonable belief that the victim was capable of consenting is a defense.
We conclude that the court did not err, because the requested instruction merely duplicated other instructions that were properly given. For similar reasons, any error was harmless because the factual question posed by the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. BoldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. MayberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. HartschCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. MolanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. BarnumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- People v. MolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- People v. Moreno CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.