Legal Opinion
BAKER, ETC. v. Miller
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1956No. 29,359PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArterburn, J.
This is an original action prosecuted by the Disciplinary Commission of this court by information under Rules 3-21 and 3-22, charging the respondent with the conviction of a felony in the United States District Court, for the Southern District of Indiana, praying that he be disbarred for that reason. A response has been filed in two paragraphs which admits the conviction, and argues in mitigation of the present charge. The reply of the Disciplinary Commission denies and takes issue on the argumentative allegations. Since no controverted issue of fact is presented, we do not feel it is…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- United States v. SchartonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- United States Ex Rel. Robinson v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. KraschelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Matter of OliverIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Clarkson v. Department of Insurance of State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. ScherrWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.