Legal Opinion

Preston v. Sabine & East Texas Railway Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1888No. 2309PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson. Tried below before the Hon. W. H. Ford.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Chief Justice.

This action was brought by the appellant to recover the value of rariload iron alleged to have been placed on land (now owned by appellant) by the East Texas Railway Company, as early as the year 1861. The iron is alleged to have been placed on the land by that company in the ordinary construction of its road, and as a part of it.

The ground of the plaintiff’s claim is that the road was constructed over the Butler league of land, without the right to occupy the land for that purpose having in any manner been acquired; that the railway thus became a part of the land and *376pa…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Northern Central Railway Co. v. Canton Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  2. Daniels v. C., I & N. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  3. Dietrich v. MurdockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
  4. California Pacific R.R. v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Morgan's Appeal v. Proceedings of Chicago & Northeastern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. GrandjeanTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Moore v. RotelloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Texas & N. O. R. v. SchoenfeldTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Bank of Shelbyville v. HartfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  5. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. DunmanTexas Supreme Court · 1892

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API