Costco Wholesale Corp. v. City of Beaverton
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*21WALTERS, J.
Under state statute, a city may annex property that is contiguous to the city by obtaining either the consent or majority vote of the owners of the property to be annexed. A city may annex property without such approval if the city boundaries “surround” the property to be annexed, a form of annexation referred to as an island annexation. In this case we decide whether a city may annex only part of an island that it surrounds without the consent or majority vote of the owners.
The territory that gives rise to the dispute in this case is made up of property owned by Wells Real Estate…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Heinig v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. Port of TillamookOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Thurber v. McMinnvilleOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Portland General Electric Co. v. City of EstacadaOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Corvallis v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Costco Wholesale Corp. v. City of BeavertonOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Thomas v. Department of Land ConservationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013