Legal Opinion

Tibbetts v. Burster

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 19, 1888PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Lee District Court. — Hon. J. M. Cásey, Judge. Action to restrain and for the abatement of an alleged liquor nuisance'. A demurrer to the answer was overruled, and judgment rendered for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

— On the twenty-ninth day of December, 1887, the plaintiff filed in the court below a petition in which he alleged that the defendant and one Stoevener were the owners of a certain lot and building described ; that they had established and were keeping and maintaining a place in said building for the manufacture and sale of intoxicating liquors as a beverage, in violation of law ; and that they were from day to day manufacturing and selling intoxicating liquors therein, contrary to law. The petition asked that the nuisance caused as aforesaid be abated ; that a temporary writ of injunction…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Halfman v. SpreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Donnelly v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Rice v. SchlappSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API