Legal Opinion
Albright v. Boston Scientific Corp.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided September 13, 2016No. AC 15-P-633PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKatzmann, J.
The plaintiff Diane Albright, an Ohio resident, brought this action in the Superior Court against defendant Boston Scientific Corporation (BSC), a Massachusetts-based company, seeking damages for injuries that she sustained after having BSC’s “Pinnacle Pelvic Floor Repair” kit (Pinnacle device) surgically implanted to treat her pelvic organ prolapse (POP) condition. 2 BSC designed, manufactured, and marketed the Pinnacle device and sold it to the Ohio hospital where Albright’s surgery took place. After a three-week trial, a jury found for BSC on Al-bright’s claims of defective design and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- Moore v. Ashland Chemical Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Seley v. G. D. Searle & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- Gregory Johnson v. Arkema, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bell v. Covidien LPDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
- ELIZABETH HRYMOC VS. ETHICON, INC. MARY MCGINNIS VS. C.R. BARD, INC. (L-13696-14 AND L-17543-14, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021
- ELIZABETH HRYMOC VS. ETHICON, INC. MARY MCGINNIS VS. C.R. BARD, INC. (L-13696-14 AND L-17543-14, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021
- ELIZABETH HRYMOC VS. ETHICON, INC. MARY MCGINNIS VS. C.R. BARD, INC. (L-13696-14 AND L-17543-14, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021
- In re EsmeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.