Legal Opinion
People v. Warner
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 12, 1895PublishedCited by 25 opinions
Error to Alcona. (Simpson, J.) ‘■Respondent was convicted of the crime of forgery, and 'sentenced to imprisonment in the State prison at Jackson for 3 years. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
The respondent was charged with forgery. The information contains two counts. The first count 'charges the forgery of an order for the payment of money, which reads as follows:
“East Tawas, Mach., March 13, 1893. -“J. H. Schmeck & Co., Bankers:
“Pay to the order of George Demming ($87.00) eighty-seven dollars. R. J. Norton.”
The second count charges the uttering of the order.
The respondent was arrested by the sheriff with the ■order in his possession, and while attempting to pass it .and get money upon it. The firm of Schmeck & Co. had failed some time before. The respondent went to the .store…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Van Sickle v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by25 opinions
- Milton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- People v. PinkneyMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
- Johns v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. AllieMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- People v. TrineMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.