Legal Opinion
IN RE METFORMIN MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 30, 2022No. 2:20-cv-02324Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IN RE METFORMIN MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICE LITIGATION Civil Action No. 20-2324 OPINION ARLEO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Motions to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), ECF No. 128, brought by: (1) the Manufacturer Defendants,1 ECF No. 132; and (2) the Pharmacy Defendants2 and AvKare, ECF No. 133. Plaintiffs3 oppose both Motions. ECF Nos. 134, 135. For the reasons explained below, each Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 1 The…
2Cases cited96 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.