Legal Opinion

Wanttaja v. Wanttaja

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 2016No. 20140436PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Caroline Wanttaja appeals from a divorce judgment and from an order denying her motion to correct a clerical error or for a new trial. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying her motion to correct a clerical error or for a new trial to address the parties’ medical bills. We conclude, however, the court erred as a matter of law in failing to address child support in the divorce proceedings and abused its discretion in denying her request for attorney fees. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

I

[¶ 2] Todd…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Fischer v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Ruff v. RuffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Bertsch v. BertschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Gruebele v. GruebeleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Reiser v. ReiserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Lizakowski v. LizakowskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Lewis v. SmartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Rasmussen v. HarveyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Fercho v. FerchoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API