State v. Bryant
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
’W’iNBORNE, J.
Appeal to the Supreme Court does not lie from a discretionary determination of an application for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. See S. v. Suddreth, 230 N.C. 754, 55 S.E. 2d 690; also S. v. Thomas, 227 N.C. 71, 40 S.E. 2d 412; S. v. Rodgers, 217 N.C. 622, 8 S.E. 2d 927; S. v. Lea, 203 N.C. 316 (at 322), 166 S.E. 292, and cases there cited. Also S. v. Grass, 223 N.C. 859, 27 S.E. 2d 443; S. v. Parker, 235 N.C. 302, 69 S.E. 2d 542.
Hence under the authority of these cases the appeal in the present case is
Dismissed.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- State v. . RodgersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- State v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- State v. . GrassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. SherronCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969