Legal Opinion
People v. Nwogu
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided October 22, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Charles S. Lopresto, J.
Defendant Emmanuel Nwogu moves in an omnibus motion for the following relief: (1) a bill of particulars; (2) discovery; (3) inspection and dismissal of the accusatory instrument; (4) suppression of physical evidence; and (5) a reservation of rights pursuant to CPL 255.20 (3). The People have responded to the motion and demand reciprocal discovery. Defendant’s motion is decided as follows:
Defendant Emmanuel Nwogu is charged with menacing in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.14 [1]), menacing in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.15), and criminal…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cooper v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. StoneCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2014
- Cooper v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Thompson v. The City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025