Legal Opinion

Nash v. Iamurri

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided August 6, 1962PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

76 N.J. Super. 167 (1962)

183 A.2d 887

TYDE NASH, PLAINTIFF,

v.

ANTONIO IAMURRI AND NED J. PARSEKIAN, DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided August 6, 1962.

Mr. John L. McGuire, attorney for plaintiff.

Mr. George D. McLaughlin, attorney for defendant (Mr. Nicholas Scalera, appearing).

FULOP, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).

This action for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident was instituted against Antonio Iamurri and, in the alternative, against Ned J.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Corrigan v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GodfreyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Gilbert v. Unsatisfied Claim, Etc., Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  3. Norman v. Selective Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  4. Selimo v. HartshornNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  5. Farnham v. StreleckiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API