State v. Russell
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORME, Presiding Judge:
Defendant appeals his convictions for aggravated arson and theft, claiming he is entitled to a new trial because nearly two hours of the record, including the record of the entire jury selection process, were never made due to an equipment malfunction. We affirm.
FACTS
The facts pertinent to this appeal may be summarily stated. A fire was discovered at a Skipper’s restaurant in Salt Lake City. When firefighters extinguished the blaze, they discovered the safe was open. Later, a restaurant manager confirmed that $941.02 had been taken from the safe. A fire…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Roberts v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. CruzUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. PrawittCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
- State v. SessionsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- West Valley City v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
- Mulder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.