Legal Opinion

New York Life Insurance v. Rosen

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtValente, J.

Plaintiff brought an action on July 16, 1928, to cancel the reinstatement of a policy of life insurance in the sum of $5,000 issued June 25, 1925, on the life of defendant Edward Rosen, with defendant Samuel Rosen as beneficiary. The policy, which contained the usual two-year incontestability clause, lapsed for non-payment of the premiums due on December 25, 1926; and on February 8, 1927, pursuant to the reinstatement provision of the policy, the insured made an application for reinstatement of the policy, in which he represented that within twenty-four months prior to such application he had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. Provident Savings Life Assurance Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. Archer v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Linder v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Holden v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Loring M. Hewen Co. v. MalterCity of New York Municipal Court · 1932
  2. Lynch v. HarrerTonawanda City Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API