Marriage of Greenlaw v. Greenlaw
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
This appeal questions whether the statutory standards permit the trial court’s decision to modify custody from sole legal and physical custody in appellant Bruce Green-law to joint legal and physical custody in appellant and respondent Natalie Green-law. The trial court’s joint custody order included a divided custody arrangement under which each party has custody of their children for a block of each school year and for alternating two-week intervals during the summer months. Bruce Greenlaw appeals. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
After six years of marriage, Bruce and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Marriage of Pikula v. PikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Auge v. AugeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State on Behalf of Gunderson v. PreussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Peterson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Feeley v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Psyck v. WojtysiakCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987