Brintley v. Aeroquip Credit Union
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
Arthur J. Tarnow, Senior United States District Judge
Plaintiff, Karla Brintley, a permanently blind woman, commenced this action against Defendant Aeroquip Credit Union alleging violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C.§ 12181 et seq. , and the Michigan Persons with Disabilities Civil Rights Act ("PWDCRA"), M.C.L. § 37.110 et seq.
Plaintiff alleges that Defendant's website contains access barriers which prevent visually-impaired individuals, like herself, from equal enjoyment of and access to Defendant's services.
Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mitchell v. Bmi Fed. Credit UnionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Jones v. Piedmont Plus Fed. Credit UnionDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018
- Jones v. Family First Credit UnionDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018
- Jones v. Lanier Fed. Credit UnionDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018