Legal Opinion

Brintley v. Aeroquip Credit Union

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 20, 2018No. Case No. 17-13912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Arthur J. Tarnow, Senior United States District Judge

Plaintiff, Karla Brintley, a permanently blind woman, commenced this action against Defendant Aeroquip Credit Union alleging violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C.§ 12181 et seq. , and the Michigan Persons with Disabilities Civil Rights Act ("PWDCRA"), M.C.L. § 37.110 et seq.

Plaintiff alleges that Defendant's website contains access barriers which prevent visually-impaired individuals, like herself, from equal enjoyment of and access to Defendant's services.

Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Bmi Fed. Credit UnionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
  2. Jones v. Piedmont Plus Fed. Credit UnionDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018
  3. Jones v. Family First Credit UnionDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018
  4. Jones v. Lanier Fed. Credit UnionDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API