Legal Opinion

People v. Billingsley

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 1969No. Docket 5,544, 5,545, 5,546PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The defendants Billingsley, Schort and Bloss appeal their convictions of sale and possession for sale of obscene literature.1 The charged offense concerned three books, “Pleasures and Follies”, “Les Enfants Terribles”, and “My Secret Life”. The *12trial judge found that My Secret Life was not obscene and limited the jury’s consideration to the other two books.

The defendants’ main contention on appeal is that the two books are not obscene in the constitutional sense. The phrase “obscene in the constitutional sense” was coined by the United States Supreme Court.2 It serves both to focus attention…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. A Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v. Attorney General of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Ginzburg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Redrup v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. BlossMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. People v. BillingsleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. People v. WassermanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. People v. WassermanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Todd v. Rochester Community SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API