Legal Opinion

Clarendon Bank & Trust v. Fid. & Deposit Co. of Md.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided December 22, 1975No. Civ. A. 296-75-APublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CLARKE, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Clarendon Bank & Trust (CB&T), seeks recovery in the amount of $307,812.10 from defendant, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (F&D), alleging that a loss sustained as the result of allowing a customer to draw on deposits which were ultimately dishonored falls within the coverage of the Banker’s Blanket Bond issued by F&D to CB&T. Plaintiff relies on Insuring Agreements B, loss of property through false pretenses, and D, loss through forgery, for recovery. Defendant alleges that the loss was not occasioned through a forgery, and so is…

2Cases cited22 opinions

Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
Gilbert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
Wayne S. Marteney v. United States of America, C. M. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Federal Deposit Ins. CorpCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, a Corporation v. Pioneer Valley Savings Bank, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

Bradley Bank v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a Connecticut Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
Mitsui Manufacturers Bank v. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
Portland Federal Employees Credit Union, a Non-Profit Corporation v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
Bay Area Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1986
NCNB NAT. BANK v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.