Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 1, 1992No. A92A0686PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Judge.

Defendant Charlotte F. Taylor was tried before a jury in state court and convicted of speeding. She appeals.

1. Defendant, appearing pro se, first argues the trial court erred in admitting evidence of speed obtained by a radar detection device because the State did not present evidence of each of the conditions imposed by OCGA § 40-14-1 et seq. for the admission of such evidence. Failure of proof as to any one of the conditions imposed by law for the admissibility of evidence of speed gained from a speed detection device results in such evidence being inadmissible. Wiggins v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chastain v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Wiggins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  3. Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Burks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Carver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. Carver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Carver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API