Carver v. State

Pope, Chief Judge.

Defendant Daniel B. Carver, Jr. was tried before a jury in state court and convicted of speeding. He appeals.

1. We first address whether the defendant’s enumeration of error is sufficient to raise both the general grounds and the admissibility of the radar results in this case. Appearing pro se, defendant’s sole “Enumeration of Errors” provides: “This Appellant contends that there was insufficient evidence to support a conviction in this case, and further, this Appellant lists three separate reasons why this case should be reversed.” At the end of the heading “Enumeration of…