Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Strickland

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1931No. File No. 6750PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPohley, P. J.

In this action plaintiff is seeking to recover damages from defendant for alienating the affections of plaintiff’s wife. The complaint is voluminous, but the gist of the -charge is contained in paragraphs 2, 3, and 4, which, are as follows:

“The plaintiff further alleges that on or about the summer and fall of 1918, while this plaintiff was living and cohabiting with and supporting his said wife on his farm near Bonilla, Beadle County, -South Dakota, the defendant well knowing that the said Luella Boyd was the lawful wife of this plaintiff did, wrongfully and intentionally, deprive this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hardwick v. HardwickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Maiden v. BoydSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Clendennen v. BainbridgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hunt v. HuntSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hunt v. HuntSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API