Legal Opinion

C. R. I. & P. Rd. v. Cohen

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 10, 1954No. 5-400PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the St. Francis Circuit Court dismissing an appeal from the municipal court of Forrest City because appellant failed to make or file with the municipal court an affidavit stating “that the appeal is not taken for the purpose of delay, but that justice may be done,” as required by Ark. Stat. § 26-1302. It is the contention of appellant, Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Eailroad Company, that Ark. Stat. § 22-707 is controlling and that this section does not require the filing of the affidavit mentioned in § 26-1302.

Section 22-707 is § 7 of Act 60 of 1927 as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Coats v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
  3. Formby v. Fulk, JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  4. Arkansas Brick & Tile Co. v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re King Furniture City, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1965
  2. González Saldaña v. Comisión IndustrialSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
  3. Daniel v. City of ClarksvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  4. González Saldaña v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API