Daniel v. City of Clarksville
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Carleton Harris, Chief Justice.
This appeal questions the validity of Act 180 of 1959. The title of that Act is “An Act to Enable Municipalities Owning and Operating Utility Plants to Issue Revenue Bonds for the Purpose of Securing and Developing Industry within or Near Said Municipalities, Said Bonds to he Paid by Rentals from Property Acquired by the Use of the Proceeds of Said Bonds and Any Additional Amount That May be Needed from the Net Revenues of Said Utility Plants; Declaring an Emergency; and for Other Purposes.” After reciting, in the preamble, the purpose of the legislation, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Coats v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
- C. R. I. & P. Rd. v. CohenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
- Curlin v. WatsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nathaniel v. Forrest City School Dist. No. 7Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Coffelt v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964