Legal Opinion

Green v. Barrett

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 2, 1903No. 29PublishedCited by 2 opinions

At Law. On motion for writ of scire facias to revive action.

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit at common law for an alleged infringement of a patent for an invention issued to the plaintiff. The defendant, Henry Barrett, died on the 23d day of December, 1892. •The plaintiff now moves that a writ of scire facias issue to the executrix of Henry Barrett, reviving the suit in accordance with section 955 of the Revised Statutes [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 697]. The ■question is whether the limitation provided by the Public Statutes of Massachusetts, 1882, c. 165, §§ 5-8, as re-enacted in the Revised Laws, 1902, c. 1.71, §§ 5, 6, applies.

The executrix has,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Campbell v. HaverhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Brady v. DalySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Security Trust Co. v. Black River National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. JoySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Hale v. CoffinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spaeth v. SellsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1909
  2. Wing v. McCallumCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API