Legal Opinion
ORBCOMM Inc. v. CalAmp Corp.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided October 19, 2016No. Civil Action No.: 3:16CV208-HEHPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION (Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration)
Henry E. Hudson, United States District Judge
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant CalAmp Corp.’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Reconsideration of Denial of Motion to Dismiss, filed on August 4, 2016. (ECF No. 35.) On May 27, 2016, Defendant moved to dismiss this patent infringement suit filed by Plaintiff ORBCOMM, Inc. (“Plaintiff’). (ECF No. 16.) On July 22, 2016, the Court denied Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, finding that all five patents at issue constitute patent-eligible subject matter pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101. (ECF Nos.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Republican Party of North Carolina v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Fayetteville Investors v. Commercial Builders, Incorporated American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- American Canoe Ass'n v. Murphy Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. v. TanaseDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2024
- E.K. v. Department of Defense Education ActivityDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025
- Ming D&Y Inc. v. Shenzhen Yima Technology Co. Ltd.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2026
- Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Netflix, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Tarun Kumar Vyas v. Sheriff Bryan Hutchenson, et al.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.