Ross v. Conoco, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
h COOKS, Judge.
This action was brought by the surviving family members of Daniel Ross and Clarence Landon against multiple defendants. The defendants are the employers of Ross and Landon (“the employer defendants”) and those whom the plaintiffs allege conspired with the employer defendants to cause Ross’s and Landon’s injuries (“the non-employer defendants”).
Factual and Procedural Background
Two suits were originally filed — one by the surviving family members of Ross and the other by the surviving family members of Landon — in April of 1997. The cases were consolidated in 1999 and styled as…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Touchard v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Butz v. LynchLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- Rush v. Town of FarmervilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Rivera v. United Gas Pipeline Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- Tabb v. NorredLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ross v. Conoco, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- Curole v. DelcambreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Charles Wayne Ross v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Jones Sr v. Travelers Indemnity CoDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2021