Legal Opinion
Garnett v. ADT LLC
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 10, 2015No. Civ. No. 2:14-2851 WBS DADPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION TO REMAND
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
Plaintiff Shirley Garnett brought this putative class action against defendant ADT LLC, asserting claims arising out of the alleged failure to reimburse her and others for work-related expenses and failure to provide wage statements required by California law. Defendant removed the action from San Joaquin County Superior Court under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(d), 1446. Plaintiff now moves to remand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c).
I. Factual and Procedural History
Plaintiff worked for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richard M. Sanchez v. Monumental Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Kathy Kroske, an Individual v. Us Bank Corp., a Foreign Corporation Dba U.S. BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kevin Michael McCarthy Thomas William BlodgettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Florin v. Nationsbank of Georgia, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gustavo Soto v. Tech Packaging, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Rivera v. Agreserves, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Sloan v. Soul Circus, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015