Legal Opinion
Noble v. 93 University Place Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 18, 2003No. 02 Civ.1803 SASPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Nigel Noble brings this action against 93 University Place Corporation, d/b/a Healthy Pleasures (“University”) and Helene Burgess, alleging that: (1) University violated New York Labor Law Section 740 (“Whistleblower Law”) by terminating No ble in retaliation for refusing to participate in and for complaining about the mislabeling of food; (2) University violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a)(1), by failing to pay overtime to Noble and other similarly situated employees; and (3) University violated New York Labor Law §…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Noble v. 93 University Place Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Scholtisek v. Eldre Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- Ulysse v. AAR Aircraft Component ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Mendez v. Radec Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- In re Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co. Mktg. & Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.