Legal Opinion

Calamco v. J.R. Simplot Co.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 13, 2022No. 2:21-cv-01201Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CALAMCO, No. 2:21-cv-01201-KJM-KJN 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. J. R. Simplot Company, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 CALAMCO, the plaintiff in this declaratory judgment action, moves to remand the case to 18 | state court and to disqualify Perkins Coie LLP, which represents the defendant, J.R. Simplot 19 | Company. Simplot has established this court’s jurisdiction based on the parties’ diversity of 20 | citizenship and the amount in controversy, and the court is not persuaded Perkins Coie faces a 21 |…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Jose Ibarra v. Manheim Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Richard M. Sanchez v. Monumental Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API