Legal Opinion

People v. Thomas

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1990PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant was in custody at Rikers Island on an unrelated charge on which he was represented by counsel. The prosecutor obtained an ex parte order directing defendant’s appearance in a lineup in this case (see, People v Coleman, 43 NY2d 222). There are undisturbed findings sufficient to support the conclusion that defendant requested the presence of his attorney at the lineup on two occasions — once while he was detained at the Kings County courthouse in connection with his arraignment on the unrelated…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. Yut Wai TomNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. ColemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. People v. LaClereNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. LeidingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. People v. SimeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. People v. OlmoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API