Legal Opinion · Dissent
State Ex Rel. Rusch v. Board of County Com'rs
Montana Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 1948No. 8793Published
1Dissent
Mr. Justice’Angstman
(dissenting).
I think my associates are in error in holding that a deputy sheriff is not an officer within the meaning of the rule that makes the salary an incident to the office.
“Although in some jurisdictions it is held that a deputy is not a public officer,,the weight of authority appears to be the other way, especially where the appointment is permanent and not merely casual for a special service, and where he is required by statute to take an oath of office.” 43 Am. Jur., p. 220, sec. 462.
In this state deputies must, take and file an oath “in the manner required of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State ex rel. Walker v. BusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- Oklahoma City v. Century Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Wells v. State ex rel. PedenIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- State Ex Rel. Stage v. MacKieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- O'Hara v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.