Legal Opinion

Drake v. Procter & Gamble Company

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided October 29, 2021No. 3:21-cv-00279Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS MICHAEL DRAKE, ) Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 21-cv-279-DWD THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, ) Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DUGAN, District Judge: This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Stay, Transfer, or Dismiss filed by Defendant, The Procter & Gamble Company (“P&G”) (Doc. 34). This case is one of four duplicative class actions filed against P&G currently pending in federal courts in New York.! Defendant asks the Court to transfer, dismiss, or stay all proceedings and deadlines in this action pending resolution…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. George McReynolds v. Merrill LynchCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Research Automation, Inc. v. Schrader-Bridgeport International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API