Legal Opinion

Kemper/prime Industrial Partners v. Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc. v. The Prime Group, Inc., Third-Party

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 19, 2007No. 05-1144PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, Circuit Judge.

This case concerns who is responsible for certain environmental clean-up costs. Kemper/Prime Industrial Partners (“Kem-per/Prime”), the plaintiff, claims that an environmental assessment of a parcel of land performed by Warzyn, Inc., the predecessor of defendant Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc. (“Montgomery”), was deficient insofar as it failed to reveal to Kemper/Prime the full extent of contamination and clean-up costs. The property in question was called the Chicago Enterprise Center (“the Property”), which Kemper/Prime purchased after receiving Warzyn’s report in 1990.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Schatz v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Law Offices of Lawrence J Stockler, PC v. RoseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. John E. Trytko, Jr. v. Hubbell, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cerretti v. Whole Foods Market Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
  2. Cuddeback v. Walmart, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2022
  3. Letoski v. The Coca-Cola CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
  4. Pursell v. Hydrochem LLC.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2022
  5. Smith v. General Mills Sales, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API