Legal Opinion

Finkelstein v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided July 25, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Inasmuch as the insured’s doctor advised him to submit to an operation for hernia, and testified that in his opinion a prudent man would have followed that advice, it cannot be held *440that the condition from which the insured was suffering constituted a total and permanent disability within the meaning of the policy. (See Palloni v. Brooklyn-Manhattan Transit ,Corp., 215 App. Div. 634.)

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

All concur; present, Callahan, Frankenthaler and Shientag, JJ.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Palloni v. Brooklyn-Manhattan Transit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blasbalg v. Massachusetts Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
  2. Muzio v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  3. Claim of Gilbert v. Towns of Pendleton & Amherst, New York County Courts1937
  4. Deakter v. Mutual Life. Ins.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1935