Finkelstein v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
Inasmuch as the insured’s doctor advised him to submit to an operation for hernia, and testified that in his opinion a prudent man would have followed that advice, it cannot be held *440that the condition from which the insured was suffering constituted a total and permanent disability within the meaning of the policy. (See Palloni v. Brooklyn-Manhattan Transit ,Corp., 215 App. Div. 634.)
Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.
All concur; present, Callahan, Frankenthaler and Shientag, JJ.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Palloni v. Brooklyn-Manhattan Transit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- Blasbalg v. Massachusetts Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Muzio v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Claim of Gilbert v. Towns of Pendleton & Amherst, New York County Courts1937
- Deakter v. Mutual Life. Ins.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1935