Legal Opinion

Gorman v. Hughes Danbury Optical Systems

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided November 22, 1995No. 3:93cv2163 (DJS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENDORSEMENT ORDER

SQUATRITO, District Judge.

This cause is now before the court on the Honorable Thomas P. Smith’s Recommended Ruling on the defendant’s motion to dismiss (document # 33). Upon review and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 2 of the Local Rules for United States Magistrate Judges (D.Conn.), the recommended ruling is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the ruling of this court, absent timely objection or response of any kind.

Accordingly, defendant’s motion to dismiss is hereby granted without prejudice to the filing of a motion conforming to Judge Smith’s directions within thirty…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ritz v. Wapello County Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  2. Seery v. Biogen, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API