Legal Opinion
Bossie v. School Administrative District No. 24
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 17, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Justice.
[¶ 1] The employee, Barbara Bossie, appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board granting her petition for award. Concluding that neither of the first three methods for computing the average weekly wage in 39-A M.R.S.A. § 102(4)(A), (B) & (C) (Supp.1997), could be fairly applied, the Board purported to apply subsection 102(4)(D) by dividing her yearly earnings by 52. Bossie contends that, because there was no evidence of the earnings of similarly situated employees pursuant to subsection D, the Board should have applied subsection B to determine her average weekly…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bureau v. Staffing Network, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- St. Pierre v. St. Regis Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Tripp v. Philips Elmet Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Thibeault's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1920
- Frank v. Manpower Temporary ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alexander v. Portland Natural GasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Alexander v. Portland Natural GasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Alexander v. Portland Natural GasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Lamonica v. HolmesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Lorri Bosse v. Sargent CorporationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025