Legal Opinion
Frank v. Manpower Temporary Services
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 24, 1996PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
Kurt Frank appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board granting his petition for award and calculating his average weekly wage as a seasonal employee pursuant to 39-A M.R.SA.. § 102(4)(C) (Supp.1996). Frank contends that because he was hired through his employer, a temporary agency, to work for Unico for an indefinite period of time immediately prior to his injury, it was error for the Board to treat his employment as seasonal. We agree and vacate the decision of the Board.
Twenty-three years of age at the time of his injury on February 3, 1993, Frank had a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re Thomas H.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- White v. Monmouth Canning CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- Thibeault's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1920
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bossie v. School Administrative District No. 24Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Alexander v. Portland Natural GasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Harrigan v. Maine Veterans HomeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Alexander v. Portland Natural GasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Frank v. Manpower Temporary ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.