Legal Opinion
Wiepert v. Manchester
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 1, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a judgment of Supreme Court, Niagara County (Fricano, J.), *948entered October 3, 2001, upon a jury verdict rendered in favor of defendants.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: We reject plaintiffs contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence (see Lolik v Big V Supermarkets, 86 NY2d 744, 746; Saggese v Madison Mut. Ins. Co., 294 AD2d 900). Plaintiffs version of the accident conflicted with that testified to by defendant Dorene A. Manchester and defendants’ expert in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Lind v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Balsz v. A & T Bus Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Duran v. Ardee AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Saggese v. Madison Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Short v. DaloiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Ford v. ChahfeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025