Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Rogers

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 7, 1842PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Will case. Case 108. Error to the Fayette Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson

On a bill filed by some of the heirs of James Rogers, dee’d. for contesting the validity of a document which had been admitted to record in the Fayette County Court, as his last will, the jury, under the statutory issue devesavit vel non, found that it was his valid will, and a decree was rendered accordingly. That decree is now sought to be reversed on three grounds, which will be considered in the order in which they have been urged in this Court.

1. An application for a continuance on account of the absence of a material witness was overruled by the Circuit Judge, who postponed the trial…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dunbar v. MeadowsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. La Bau v. VanderbiltNew York Surrogate's Court · 1879
  3. Wall v. DimmittCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  4. Henning v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  5. McConnell's Exr. v. McConnellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API