Legal Opinion

In Re Nomination Papers of Rogers

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 19, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

President Judge COLINS.

Carl Romanelli, Green Party candidate for U.S. Senate, (Candidate) has filed a “Motion for Emergency Relief to Correct the Number of Signatures Required for a Minor Party Candidate for the United States Senate in 2006.” The issue raised appears to be one of first impression in Pennsylvania and of considerable importance to the parties in this case as well as future independent or third-party candidates for office.

Section 912.1 of the Election Code, Act of June 3, 1938, P.L. 1333, as amended, 25 P.S. § 2872.1, requires that a petition for nomination at a party…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Abraham v. ShappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Hornsby v. CampbellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  3. Brink's Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Nomination Paper of RogersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. In Re Nomination Paper of RogersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API