City & County of Denver v. Perkins
Supreme Court of Colorado
' Appeal from Denver District Court — lion. Samuel L. Carpenter, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill
Appellee, as plaintiff, brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained through tiie alleged negligence of the appellant. It is claimed this negligence consisted in permitting an excavation to be and remain in one of the streets of the city for the purpose of laying curbing, etc. A trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, from which defendant appeals.
The sufficiency of the notice required by the charter of the city is the first question presented. The *161contention is, that it did not correctly state the place where the injury occurred, and for this reason…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. v. HarrymanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- City of Pueblo v. BabbittSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Miller v. Camp Bird, Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1909
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of East Chicago v. GilbertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Nagle v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Nelson v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
- Bolles v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
- Lynch v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.