Legal Opinion

Miller v. Camp Bird, Ltd.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1909No. 5779PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Denver District Court — Hon. Frank T. Johnson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Musser

The plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff below, began work for the defendant in the Camp- Bird mine on November 11, 1902. The first day he carried plank into the mine,- the next day he was engaged *571in putting timbers overhead in a tunnel; the third day he sawed plank in the tunnel, and helped to elevate the plank, after being sawed, to a stope; on the fourth day, the 14th day.of November, he was engaged as a.helper with one Dalra in planking an ore chute. The planks were nailed to stulls, which were about six feet apart. Dalra stood on the stull to which he nailed the lower ends of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Davis Sulphur Ore Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. Orman v. MannixSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  3. Carberry v. Inhabitants of SharonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  4. Fuller v. Inhabitants of Hyde ParkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  5. Gardner v. Inhabitants of WeymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Swaim v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. City & County of Denver v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  3. Rapson Coal Mining Co. v. MicheliSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API