Sytnyczenko v. Pearson
New York County Courts
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam E. J. Connor, J.
This is the return of an order to show cause why a manifest clerical error in the report of a jury after the trial of an action for breach of contract should not be corrected by the court. The trial minutes indicate the following upon the return of the jury: “ The Court: What is your verdict? Foreman: As Foreman of the Jury I have been directed to render a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $166.50, which represents the actual cost to him, $.50 per bale on the 373 bale shortage.”
At the time of the rendition of the verdict, it apparently did not occur to anyone, including the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dalrymple v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Warner v. . New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Hodgkins v. . MeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Demms v. BlanchardNew York Supreme Court · 1934
- Selig v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.