Legal Opinion

Sytnyczenko v. Pearson

New York County Courts

Decided March 24, 1958Published

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam E. J. Connor, J.

This is the return of an order to show cause why a manifest clerical error in the report of a jury after the trial of an action for breach of contract should not be corrected by the court. The trial minutes indicate the following upon the return of the jury: “ The Court: What is your verdict? Foreman: As Foreman of the Jury I have been directed to render a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $166.50, which represents the actual cost to him, $.50 per bale on the 373 bale shortage.”

At the time of the rendition of the verdict, it apparently did not occur to anyone, including the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dalrymple v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Warner v. . New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Hodgkins v. . MeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Demms v. BlanchardNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Selig v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API