Legal Opinion
Demms v. Blanchard
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLauer, J.
This action was instituted by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover the sum of $10,000. The theory of the plaintiff’s complaint was that by reason of certain misrepresenta-' tions and fraud the plaintiff was induced to lend to the Combustion Specialty Corporation the sum of $10,000. This sum was advanced in four separaté installments at different times. The first advance was $5,000 on August 15, 1929, and the three further advances were made at later periods. The jury found for the plaintiff in the sum of $5,000. The plaintiff thereafter at the same term moved to amend the verdict to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Smith v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Faber v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Prager v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass Insurance Co. of NewarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Holden v. . New York and Erie BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Wilson v. . City of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Collier v. GrangerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Davis v. McDanielCivil Court of the City of New York · 1969
- American Castype Corp. v. Niles-Bement-Pond Co.New York Supreme Court · 1941
- Mutual Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. OsborneAlabama Court of Appeals · 1945
- In re the Accounting of JenningsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.