Legal Opinion

Smith v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 22, 1897No. 200Published

Error from Dickinson District Court. Hon. James Humphrey, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtMcElroy, J.

This was an action in replevin brought by Lydia A. Wilson, as plaintiff, against James S. Smith, Sheriff, and John Johntz, A. W. Rice, D. R. Gordon, T. H. Malott and W. B. Giles, copartners as Malott & Co., defendants, for the recovery of certain personal property consisting of steers, cattle, hogs, horses and farm implements, and for damages sustained by the plaintiff by reason of defendants’ wrongful taking and detention thereof. The property in controversy had been seized by the Sheriff upon an execu*380tion, issued in a casein which said Malott & Co. were plaintiffs and Thomas J. Wilson, the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Wyandotte v. GibsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Bent v. PhilbrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  3. Sumner v. CookSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  4. Kurtz v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  5. Scheble v. JordanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API