Legal Opinion

Scheble v. Jordan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1883PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Reno District Court. Action by Scheble against Jordan and another, to recover the possession of two horses. At the September Term, 1881, of the district court, defendants had judgment against plaintiff, who brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

This was an action of replevin for two horses. The case was tried by a jury; verdict and judgment were for defendants. Plaintiff'alleges error. The plaintiff claimed title by purchase from one Mrs. E. J. Robinson, on March 7, 1881. He introduced in evidence the bill of sale, proved that the horses were delivered to him on that day, and that he had kept the possession until March 14th, when they *354were taken on an attachment against C. Bomgardner and J. C. Robinson, the husband of Mrs. E. J. Robinson. After the plaintiff had finished his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. FullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. Osborne v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Kayser v. HeavenrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  4. Sumner v. CookSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. EikenberryNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Bank of Inman v. GravesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Kitchell v. HodgenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. Home Hardware & Implement Co. v. DennistonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. Smith v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API