Legal Opinion
The Florida Bar v. Kandekore
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided June 1, 2000No. SC87538PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
766 So.2d 1004 (2000)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
v.
Lijyasu Mahomet KANDEKORE, Respondent.
No. SC87538.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 1, 2000.
Rehearing Denied September 1, 2000.
John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and John Anthony Boggs, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, Florida, and Randi Klayman Lazarus, Bar Counsel, Miami, Florida, for Complainant.
Lijyasu Mahomet Kandekore, Miami, Florida, Respondent, pro se.
2Per curiam
We have for review the report of the referee recommending that disciplinary measures be imposed upon respondent, Lijyasu M. Kandekore, for alleged ethical breaches. We have jurisdiction.…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. WilkesSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- The Florida Bar v. VernellSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- The Florida Bar v. LipmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- The Florida Bar v. CarricarteSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- The Florida Bar v. PavlickSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- The Florida Bar v. HeadSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- In Re Lijyasu M. KANDEKORE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- The Florida Bar v. TiplerSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- The Florida Bar v. CohenSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.