Legal Opinion · Dissent

In the Interest of S.C.S.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 31, 2001No. 14-00-00060-CVPublished

1DissentWittig, Justice

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion on three distinct grounds. First the application of Family Code section 157.005 is retroactive and consequently prohibited by the Texas Constitution. Second, the trial court had lost jurisdiction to hear this case and therefore could not “retain” what it did not have. Third, the majority effectively holds that the supreme court’s decision in Huff v. Huff, 648 S.W.2d 286 (Tex.1983), is no longer controlling in Texas and ignores a residual 10-year limitations statute.

Appellant argues the new section 157.005 of the Family Code constitutes a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Mellinger v. City of Houston (Tex. 1-18-1887)Texas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Apex Towing Co. v. TolinTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Baker Hughes, Inc. v. KECO R. & D., INC.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Turner v. Cross and Eddy, ReceiversTexas Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API