Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Zuanich v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided August 20, 1981No. Docket No. 594-78Published

Petitioner-husband discussed with respondent's agents the availability of the foreign tax credit on account of Canadian taxes paid by a corporation of which petitioner-husband was majority shareholder. Held, the doctrine of equitable estoppel does not bar respondent from disallowing this credit ( Automobile Club of Michigan v. Commissioner, 353 U.S. 180 (1957)); this credit is not allowable.

Read the full summary

Petitioner-husband discussed with respondent's agents the availability of the foreign tax credit on account of Canadian taxes paid by a corporation of which petitioner-husband was majority shareholder. Held, the doctrine of equitable estoppel does not bar respondent from disallowing this credit ( Automobile Club of Michigan v. Commissioner, 353 U.S. 180 (1957)); this credit is not allowable. Petitioner-husband purchased and placed into service on his commercial fishing vessel a hydraulic fishing reel. He purchased the reel entirely with funds withdrawn from a capital construction fund…

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGoffe, J.

I fully concur with the majority as to the foreign tax credit issue but respectfully dissent as to the investment credit issue. I would, instead, reach the result reached by the Court of Claims in the following eight cases: Pacific Far East Line, Inc. v. United States, 211 Ct. Cl. 71, 544 F.2d 478 (1976); Pacific Transport Co. v. United States, 211 Ct. Cl. 99, 544 F.2d 493 (1976); Delta Steamship Lines, Inc. v. United States, 211 Ct. Cl. 104, 544 F.2d 496 (1976); Oglebay Norton Co. v. United States, 221 Ct. Cl. 749, 610 F.2d 715 (1979); O. L. Schmidt Barge Lines, Inc. v. United States, 221…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United Telecommunications, Inc. (Formerly United Utilities, Incorporated) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  3. Minot Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  4. Rockford Life Insurance v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. United Telecommunications, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API